How Much Is Composition No. IV, with Red, Blue, and Yellow Worth?

$30-55 million

Last updated: April 18, 2026

Quick Facts

Methodology
comparable analysis

This is a catalogue‑listed 1929 Mondrian (Stedelijk inv. A 9916; catalogue B216). If hypothetically offered for sale, using recent auction benchmarks for late Neoplastic Mondrians and adjusting for scale and museum provenance, a realistic market range is $30–55 million. Final price would be driven by condition, full provenance/exhibition history, and whether deaccession is practicable.

Composition No. IV, with Red, Blue, and Yellow

Piet Mondrian, 1929 • Oil on canvas

Read full analysis of Composition No. IV, with Red, Blue, and Yellow

Valuation Analysis

Identification & context: Piet Mondrian’s Composition No. IV, with Red, Blue and Yellow (1929), catalogue B216, is held by the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam (inv. A 9916) and is recorded online as an oil on canvas, 52 × 51.5 cm [1]. As a documented work from Mondrian’s mature Neoplastic phase, it is materially important to scholars and institutions but has no modern public‑auction sale record because it is museum‑held.

Comparables and anchors: The most relevant market anchors are high‑profile public sales of late 1920s–1930s Mondrians: Sotheby’s New York (Composition No. II, 1930) in Nov 2022 realized ~US$51M (with premium) and Christie’s (Composition No. III, 1929) in May 2015 realized in the ~$50M range; a further marquee Mondrian sale in May 2025 again demonstrated robust demand for canonical Neoplastic canvases [2][3][4]. Those results set the ceiling context for well‑provenanced, museum‑quality works of similar date and execution.

How the range was derived: I used a comparable‑analysis approach anchored to the high‑end auction results above and then applied qualitative adjustments: the painting’s modest square dimensions (52 × 51.5 cm) temper value relative to larger, exhibition centerpiece canvases; conversely, institutional (Stedelijk) ownership and a catalogue‑raisonné entry support authenticity and scholarly value and can enhance buyer confidence. Taking those offsets into account produces a practical sale range of USD 30,000,000–55,000,000 for a hypothetical offering with full documentation and good condition. The lower bound reflects conservative pricing for smaller scale and/or limited exhibition/publishing; the upper bound approximates the premium a museum‑provenanced, canonical 1929 Neoplastic canvas could attract against the recent market benchmarks [2][3].

Key contingencies: This valuation is conditional and hypothetical: (1) the Stedelijk’s full provenance, acquisition record, and any exhibition/publication history must be reviewed; (2) a current detailed condition/conservation report and technical analysis (IRR/X‑ray/pigment) is required; and (3) practical/legal constraints on deaccession may prevent any sale. Any significant conservation issues, gaps in provenance, or absence from major exhibitions/publications would materially lower value; conversely, documented exhibition history and pristine condition could push a sale toward the top of the stated range.

Recommended next steps: Request from the Stedelijk the acquisition/provenance files for inv. A 9916, high‑resolution recto/verso images, and conservation reports; then obtain a formal pre‑sale estimate from a major auction house or specialist. With those documents we can tighten this range and identify the closest sold comparables by size and execution.

Key Valuation Factors

Art Historical Significance

High Impact

Composition No. IV (1929) sits in Mondrian’s mature Neoplastic period when his grid vocabulary, use of primary colour blocks and refined proportion reached artistic clarity. Works from this phase are central to 20th‑century abstraction studies and are highly desired by museums and blue‑chip collectors. The painting’s catalogue‑raisonné entry (B216) and institutional housing at the Stedelijk indicate recognized scholarship and provenance, which elevate market confidence. Art‑historical importance is a high‑impact factor: it directly supports institutional demand and the willingness of collectors to pay premium prices when works are available, especially when coupled with strong provenance and exhibition history.

Provenance & Exhibition History

High Impact

Museum ownership (Stedelijk inv. A 9916) typically signals a secure provenance, which is a major positive in auction and private sale contexts. A continuous, documented chain of ownership, plus prominent exhibition and publication citations, materially increase buyer competition and price realizations. Conversely, provenance gaps, contested ownership, or absence from major catalogues and retrospectives reduce buyer confidence and can lower value significantly. Because deaccessioning a museum painting involves legal and policy hurdles, provenance also affects the practicality and timing of any potential sale.

Condition & Technical Status

High Impact

Condition is a primary value driver: original stretcher, stable paint film, minimal inpainting and no structural relining produce top prices; conversely, extensive restoration, heavy relining, or paint loss can reduce price materially. Technical confirmation of pigments, adhesives and an absence of later significant alterations increases the immediacy and reliability of market estimates. A current conservation report and IRR/X‑ray analysis will therefore be determinative in final pricing and are required for any firm auction estimate.

Size & Execution

Medium Impact

At 52 × 51.5 cm this is a modestly scaled square canvas. Size influences collector demand: larger, showpiece canvases often attract the highest bids; smaller, superbly executed canvases still command strong interest but frequently at lower nominal levels than monumental works. Equally important is whether the work is a finished canonical canvas or a study/variant. A tightly executed, finished Neoplastic composition will be valued well above a workshop study of similar dimensions.

Market Comparables & Liquidity

High Impact

Recent marquee sales for late‑1920s/1930s Mondrians (notably the ~$47–51M range in 2015 and 2022) establish clear high‑end market anchors and demonstrate robust liquidity for canonical works. Top collectors and institutions are active buyers, and auction houses achieve strong competitive bidding when provenance and condition are exemplary. Liquidity for smaller or less documented Mondrians is lower; however, institutional provenance and catalogued status materially improve marketability and likely speed of sale.

Sale History

Composition No. IV, with Red, Blue, and Yellow has never been sold at public auction.

Piet Mondrian's Market

Piet Mondrian is a blue‑chip Modern master. His mature Neoplastic canvases are among the most sought‑after works of 20th‑century abstraction; recent auction records and marquee sales place top examples firmly in the mid‑to‑high tens of millions. Demand is driven by museums and high‑net‑worth private collectors, and the secondary market is selective but deep for authenticated, well‑provenanced canvases. Fewer canonical works come to market than buyer demand, which supports strong pricing for top examples.

Comparable Sales

Composition No. II

Piet Mondrian

Same artist, same late Neoplastic period (1930) and very similar canonical grid vocabulary and scale — a market benchmark for Mondrian's mature abstract works.

$51.0M

2022, Sotheby's New York

~$56.1M adjusted

Composition No. III

Piet Mondrian

Same year (1929) as the Stedelijk work and a canonical finished Neoplastic composition — a primary precedent used to value late-1920s Mondrians.

$50.6M

2015, Christie's New York

~$68.7M adjusted

Composition with Large Red Plane, Bluish Gray, Yellow, Black and Blue

Piet Mondrian

High-price sale of an important Mondrian Neoplastic work (1922) in a major spring marquee sale — shows depth of demand across related periods/styles for Mondrian's abstract canvases.

$47.6M

2025, Christie's New York

Current Market Trends

Blue‑chip Modern art remains resilient. Recent high‑profile Mondrian sales have set strong price anchors and sustained collector interest. Macro factors (liquidity, interest rates, and geopolitical risk) influence timing and intensity of bidding, but canonical works with museum provenance and publication/exhibition histories continue to attract competitive offers and remain the most liquid segment of the market.

Disclaimer: This estimate is for informational and educational purposes only. It is based on publicly available data and AI analysis. It should not be used for insurance, tax, estate planning, or sale purposes. For formal appraisals, consult a certified appraiser.

Explore More by Piet Mondrian

More valuations by Piet Mondrian