How Much Is Selbstbildnis mit Modell (Self‑Portrait with Model / Self‑Portrait with Model, fragment) Worth?

$9.0-18.0 million

Last updated: July 8, 2026

Quick Facts

Last Sale
$11.3M (2013, Christie's New York)
Methodology
comparable analysis

Anchored to the documented Christie’s New York sale (Price Realized $11,323,750 on 2013-05-08) for this exact painting and adjusted against major 1912–1915 Schiele comparables and recent market movement, the present market estimate for the autograph 1913 oil Selbstbildnis mit Modell (fragment) is approximately $9.0–18.0 million. This assumes clear title, no restitution claims and a major‑venue sale; condition or provenance issues would push the result materially lower.

Selbstbildnis mit Modell (Self‑Portrait with Model / Self‑Portrait with Model, fragment)

Egon Schiele, 1913 • Oil on canvas

View more by Egon Schiele

Valuation Analysis

Valuation anchor and scope. This valuation is anchored to the recorded Christie’s New York sale of the exact work, offered as Lot 37 and consigned by the Neue Galerie New York, with a Price Realized of $11,323,750 on 8 May 2013. Christie’s lot page lists the published provenance and exhibition citations that establish the painting as an autograph 1913 oil by Egon Schiele [1], and the house press release records the sale result [2]. I treat that 2013 invoice as the primary market anchor and then apply a comparables‑based analysis and market adjustment to generate a present‑day estimate.

Comparables and market context. Comparable museum‑quality Schiele oils from the 1912–1915 period have realized significantly higher sums at major evening sales (for example, Sotheby’s Dämmernde Stadt in 2018 and other landmark results), demonstrating top‑end demand for canonical canvases of this decade [3]. At the same time, the market since 2018–2026 shows selective strength at the top but a measurable recalibration: single‑owner and guaranteed evening sales still reach the mid‑ to high‑seven figures and above, while works with condition issues, uncertain title or fragmentary format trade at a discount. I therefore position the present value range to reflect the 2013 anchor adjusted for market movement, liquidity and the wide impact condition/provenance can have.

Low‑case scenario. If the painting were to present with unresolved conservation problems (extensive edge loss from trimming, heavy inpainting, structurally compromised lining) or evidence of incomplete provenance or potential restitution claims, buyer confidence would be reduced and the work would likely trade toward the lower part of the stated range or below it. In such a case the market would treat the lot as a secondary, fragmentary Schiele and bid accordingly, with prominent bidders abstaining or offering conservatively.

High‑case scenario. Conversely, if an up‑to‑date technical and conservation report confirms structural stability with only minor inpainting, the provenance checks are clean, and the work is marketed in a major evening sale with specialist promotion and institutional interest, the painting could outperform its 2013 invoice in real terms. Established literature and exhibition entries, together with museum‑quality provenance (as cited in Christie’s lot notes), materially improve sale prospects and place the work within the seven‑figure to low‑eight‑figure bracket articulated below.

Conclusion and next actions. The recommended working range—$9.0–18.0 million—reflects the 2013 sale anchor, recent top‑end comparables and a market that rewards provenance and condition while discounting fragmentary or legally uncertain works. To convert this preliminary valuation into a firm pre‑sale estimate, commission a full condition and technical report, complete provenance and title clearance (restitution checks to c. 1948), and seek parallel pre‑sale opinions from the Impressionist & Modern specialists at Christie’s and Sotheby’s. With those materials I can produce a tightened estimate and a recommended sale strategy.

Key Valuation Factors

Art Historical Significance

High Impact

The subject (a self‑portrait with a model) and the date (1913) place the work squarely in Schiele’s mature pre‑war period when his self‑portraits and figure studies were central to his practice. If the canvas is the published, autograph painting cited in the literature and exhibition records, it carries elevated art‑historical importance relative to undocumented studio fragments. The fragmentary state reduces compositional completeness and may limit its primacy in scholarship, but literature and exhibition entries offset that loss: the work still contributes meaningfully to understanding Schiele’s formal and psychological concerns in 1913. For these reasons, art‑historical significance here exerts a high positive impact on commercial value.

Provenance & Exhibition History

High Impact

Provenance is a decisive commercial variable for Schiele. The Christie’s entry for the 2013 sale records descent from Benedikt Fred Dolbin, passage through the Serge Sabarsky gallery and eventual consignment by the Neue Galerie — a chain that materially reduces market and legal risk and increases institutional acceptability. Strong, published provenance and exhibition citations increase competitive bidding and support evening‑sale outcomes in the high seven‑figure bracket. By contrast, provenance gaps, especially during the 1930s–1940s, or unresolved restitution issues would sharply depress interest and price. Given the recorded chain, provenance impact is high, but formal title clearance is still required for sale certainty.

Condition & Fragmentary State

High Impact

The painting’s condition and its designation as a ‘fragment’ are central to valuation. Trimming or loss of peripheral imagery can undermine compositional integrity and scholarly desirability; structural issues (weakened canvas, historic relining, tears) and extensive inpainting further reduce insurability and bidder confidence. Conversely, sympathetic conservation that confirms a stable paint film and limited intervention substantially mitigates downside. Detailed technical analysis (X‑ray, IRR, pigment and canvas weave studies) will determine whether the market treats the lot as a museum‑quality autograph or a secondary fragment; thus condition exerts a high impact on likely price realization.

Market Liquidity & Buyer Demand

Medium Impact

High‑end Schiele demand is concentrated among museums and deep‑pocket private collectors; this concentration makes liquidity sensitive to sale venue and catalogue prominence. Works with museum‑quality provenance and literature attract competitive international bidding; fragmentary or legally uncertain works face a narrower buyer pool and typically trade at a discount in regional houses or private channels. Recent market seasons (2018–2026) show selective strength at the top but recalibration elsewhere. Therefore buyer demand supports seven‑figure pricing for well‑documented oils, while narrower demand for fragments moderates liquidity — giving this factor a medium impact on the valuation range.

Sale History

Price unknownMay 8, 2013

Christie's New York

Egon Schiele's Market

Egon Schiele occupies a blue‑chip position within early 20th‑century Austrian art markets. His most important canvases command multi‑million to high‑multi‑million prices at major evening sales, while museum‑quality drawings also achieve strong results. The market dynamic is driven by scarcity of top‑quality works, institutional acquisition demand and the artist’s canonical status in Vienna Secession scholarship. Recent seasons have shown selective resilience at the top with broader recalibration; nonetheless, a properly documented, published oil by Schiele remains of high collector and institutional interest and typically commands seven‑figure valuations.

Comparable Sales

Selbstbildnis mit Modell (Fragment)

Egon Schiele

Exact same autograph work: large 1913 oil, published and exhibited, sold with full provenance — the strongest direct comparable and primary anchor for valuation.

$11.3M

2013, Christie's New York

~$15.1M adjusted

Dämmernde Stadt (Die kleine Stadt II)

Egon Schiele

Large, museum-quality oil by Schiele from the same 1912–1915 period; demonstrates that canonical oils of this moment can reach mid/high tens of millions at major evening sales.

$24.6M

2018, Sotheby's New York

~$29.7M adjusted

Häuser mit bunter Wäsche (Vorstadt II) / Houses with Laundry (Suburb II)

Egon Schiele

High-water mark for a Schiele canvas (major institutional-quality work from the same period); serves as the top-of-market anchor for Schiele paintings.

$39.6M

2011, Sotheby's London

~$53.9M adjusted

Danaë

Egon Schiele

Recent high-profile single-owner evening-sale result for a major Schiele figurative canvas; illustrates both continued demand and recent market recalibration at the top end.

$23.6M

2026, Sotheby's London (Joe Lewis single-owner sale)

~$22.9M adjusted

Crouching Nude (drawing, 1917)

Egon Schiele

Museum-quality Schiele work on paper realizing multi-million euros — not the same medium but useful to define the lower band for high-quality, well-provenanced Schiele material.

$3.7M

2025, Dorotheum, Vienna

Current Market Trends

As of mid‑2026 the market shows selective strength at the top and tighter pricing elsewhere. Single‑owner evening sales and guaranteed lots produce headline results, but overall estimates have been recalibrated. Buyers demand clear provenance, recent technical reports and legal certainty; works with title ambiguity or substantial conservation needs face discounts. Works on paper remain a robust submarket and occasionally outperform modest canvases where rarity and provenance align.

Disclaimer: This estimate is for informational and educational purposes only. It is based on publicly available data and AI analysis. It should not be used for insurance, tax, estate planning, or sale purposes. For formal appraisals, consult a certified appraiser.

Explore More by Egon Schiele

More valuations by Egon Schiele