La Japonaise (Camille Monet in Japanese Costume)

by Claude Monet

Claude Monet’s La Japonaise (Camille Monet in Japanese Costume) (1876) stages a witty confrontation between Parisian modernity and the fashion for Japonisme. A fair-skinned model in a blazing red uchikake preens before a wall tiled with uchiwa fans, lifting a tricolor hand fan that asserts Frenchness amid the imported decor. The painting turns costume, props, and gaze into a performance about desire, display, and identity [1][2].

Fast Facts

Year
1876
Medium
Oil on canvas
Dimensions
231.8 × 142.3 cm
Location
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
La Japonaise (Camille Monet in Japanese Costume) by Claude Monet (1876)

Click on any numbered symbol to learn more about its meaning

Meaning & Symbolism

Monet constructs a stage where identity is performed rather than affirmed. The woman’s blonde coiffure—known from museum research to have been a wig—advertises her unambiguous Westernness even as she is swathed in a heavy red uchikake embroidered with gilt maple leaves and a fierce samurai head gripping a sword. Her sidelong, knowing glance locks the viewer into the game, while her lifted folding fan is painted in red, white, and blue, a pointed citation of the French tricolore. In one stroke, the fan declares that the spectacle is French taste performing “Japan,” not Japan performing itself. Beneath her, the robe puddles into a sumptuous scarlet heap whose embroidered samurai face and weapon sit provocatively at the level of her hips and thighs—details that nineteenth‑century critics noticed and read as risqué—so that masculine martial emblems become part of a coquettish Parisian display. The floor covering suggests tatami, completing a meticulously assembled mise‑en‑scène of imported signs that the artist arranges like stage props 12. Formally, Monet turns Japonisme from subject matter into pictorial method. The cool green wall behind the figure is studded with dozens of uchiwa fans that flatten depth and convert the background into a patterned screen. That flattening, borrowed from ukiyo‑e prints, lets the blazing red garment pop forward as a decorative surface rather than a receding volume, aligning Impressionist color bravura with Japanese design principles. The canvas is monumental, a full‑length figure on the scale of grand portraiture, yet it refuses the usual claims to stable identity; instead, it parades surface, costume, and pose as the truth of modern selfhood. Contemporary observers caught this doubleness—praising its “prodigious” color while also mocking it as a flashy doll—evidence that viewers sensed both the seduction and the satire embedded in the picture 23. The painting also exposes the mechanics of cultural translation. The uchikake is not everyday dress but a theatrical robe associated with performance; its use here compacts multiple layers of role‑play: a French woman wears a stage costume from a different culture that historically mediated femininity through codified performance. By coupling that garment with a patriotic fan and a wig that emphasizes her European identity, Monet reveals the asymmetry of fascination—how Parisian modernity consumes and re‑scripts the exotic for its own pleasures. Scholars have read the work as both a market‑savvy “japonerie” and a self‑aware commentary on that very market, a tension Monet himself later amplified in dismissive remarks about the picture. Whatever his retrospective qualms, the canvas crystallizes a key modern insight: that beauty and identity in the capitalist metropolis are constructed displays, negotiated through commodities, images, and the gaze. In this sense, La Japonaise (Camille Monet in Japanese Costume) is not a detour from Impressionism but a forceful articulation of its modernity—binding optical brilliance to the social play of performance, consumption, and desire 1245.

Explore Deeper with AI

Ask questions about La Japonaise (Camille Monet in Japanese Costume)

Popular questions:

Powered by AI • Get instant insights about this artwork

💬 Ask questions about this artwork!

Interpretations

Market Modernity & Appropriation

Monet titles the work “Japonerie” at the 1876 exhibition, telegraphing a savvy alignment with a booming market in Japanese‑style commodities. The monumental scale and virtuoso red spectacle read as a calculated bid for attention within a crowded Paris art economy. Later, Monet’s remark—reported by dealer René Gimpel—dismissing the canvas as a mere “fantasy” and even “une saleté” sharpens a paradox: the painting both exploits and critiques Japonisme’s commercialization by turning Japanese objects into brilliant, saleable effects while exposing that very process as theater. In this sense, La Japonaise operates as a case study in modern authorship as curation and recombination of imported signs, testing the boundary between homage, opportunism, and self‑aware pastiche 235.

Source: MFA Boston; René Gimpel; The Met (Japonisme)

Gender Performativity via the Uchikake

The garment is an uchikake, a heavy outer robe tied to theatrical display and, in kabuki, to the gender‑crossing labor of onnagata. Draped over a European sitter in a blonde wig, it multiplies layers of role‑play: a French woman dons a costume historically used by male actors to code femininity, then poses amid Japanese props for a Paris audience. The embroidered samurai head—strategically near the hips—compounds the charge, inserting an aggressive masculine emblem into a flirtatious mise‑en‑scène that critics read as risqué. The picture thus frames gender not as essence but as scripted citation—a choreography of textile, icon, and gaze—while revealing how Orientalist fantasies shape which versions of “femininity” become legible and desirable in the West 24.

Source: MFA Boston; Michelle Liu Carriger (Theatre Research International)

Patriotic Branding Inside the Exotic

The lifted fan painted red‑white‑blue punctures any illusion of cultural immersion. It functions as a miniature tricolore planted within a Japanese set, declaring that the spectacle is France performing Japan. This insertion reframes the robe and fan wall as props in a national self‑presentation, aligning modern Frenchness with cosmopolitan command over foreign styles. The sitter’s sidelong glance—complicit, almost conspiratorial—recruits the viewer into this charade, inviting recognition that the scene’s authority flows not from ethnographic truth but from the staging power of Parisian taste. National identity here is not threatened by the exotic; it is branded, burnished, and sold through it 2.

Source: MFA Boston (object and conservation texts)

Flatness as Method: Japonisme Meets Impressionism

The wall studded with uchiwa fans collapses depth into patterned surface, echoing ukiyo‑e’s ornamental flatness and turning background into a screen. This design choice makes the flaming red uchikake read as a decorative plane rather than a receding volume, syncing Impressionist color bravura with Japanese compositional logics. Monet thereby shifts Japonisme from iconographic borrowing to a pictorial grammar—pattern, contour, and chromatic punch—testing how European oil painting can internalize print aesthetics. The result is a reflexive demonstration: modern vision becomes a negotiation among mediums and markets of seeing, with the painting advertising its own constructedness as part of its pleasure 23.

Source: MFA Boston; The Met (Heilbrunn Timeline, Japonisme)

Empire of Things: Display, Possession, Debate

Arranged like stage props, the tatami, fans, and uchikake convert imported objects into signs of mastery—evidence of access, capital, and curatorial control. This “mise‑en‑scène of imported signs” anticipates how museums and consumers would turn Japanese goods into spectacles of Western cosmopolitanism. The painting’s afterlife confirms the stakes: the MFA’s 2015 “Kimono Wednesdays” program, inspired by La Japonaise, ignited protests over appropriation versus appreciation, showing how such displays still mediate power, consent, and spectatorship. Monet’s canvas thus reads as both artifact and critique of imperial modernity: beauty arrives through acquisition and arrangement—and remains contested in the gallery today 26.

Source: MFA Boston (conservation/reception); Los Angeles Times (2015 coverage)

Related Themes

About Claude Monet

Claude Monet (1840–1926) led Impressionism’s pursuit of open-air painting and optical immediacy, especially during his Argenteuil years focused on modern leisure and light. He later developed serial studies of changing conditions, culminating in the Water Lilies cycle [2].
View all works by Claude Monet

More by Claude Monet

Boating by Claude Monet

Boating

Claude Monet (1887)

Monet’s Boating crystallizes modern leisure as a drama of perception, setting a slim skiff and two pale dresses against a field of dark, mobile water. Bold cropping, a thrusting oar, and the complementary flash of hull and foliage convert a quiet outing into an experiment in <strong>modern vision</strong> and the <strong>materiality of water</strong> <sup>[1]</sup><sup>[2]</sup>.

The Thames below Westminster by Claude Monet

The Thames below Westminster

Claude Monet (about 1871)

Claude Monet’s The Thames below Westminster turns London into <strong>light-made architecture</strong>, where Parliament’s mass dissolves into mist and the river shivers with <strong>industrial motion</strong>. Tugboats, a timber jetty with workers, and the rebuilt Westminster Bridge assert a modern city whose power is felt through atmosphere more than outline <sup>[1]</sup>.

Haystacks Series by Claude Monet | Light, Time & Atmosphere by Claude Monet

Haystacks Series by Claude Monet | Light, Time & Atmosphere

Claude Monet

Claude Monet’s <strong>Haystacks Series</strong> transforms a routine rural subject into an inquiry into <strong>light, time, and perception</strong>. In this sunset view, the stacks swell at the left while the sun burns through the gap, making the field shimmer with <strong>apricot, lilac, and blue</strong> vibrations.

Women in the Garden by Claude Monet

Women in the Garden

Claude Monet (1866–1867)

Claude Monet’s Women in the Garden choreographs four figures in a sunlit bower to test how <strong>white dresses</strong> register <strong>dappled light</strong> and shadow. The path, parasol, and clipped flowers frame a modern ritual of leisure while turning fashion into an instrument of <strong>perception</strong>. The scene reads less as portraiture than as a manifesto for painting the <strong>momentary</strong> outdoors <sup>[1]</sup><sup>[3]</sup>.

Impression, Sunrise by Claude Monet

Impression, Sunrise

Claude Monet (1872)

In Impression, Sunrise, Claude Monet turns Le Havre’s fog-bound harbor into an experiment in <strong>immediacy</strong> and <strong>modernity</strong>. Cool blue-greens dissolve cranes, masts, and smoke, while a small skiff cuts the water beneath a blazing, <strong>equiluminant</strong> orange sun whose vertical reflection stitches the scene together <sup>[1]</sup><sup>[3]</sup>. The effect is a poised dawn where industry meets nature, a quiet <strong>awakening</strong> rendered through light rather than line.

The Train in the Snow (The Locomotive) by Claude Monet

The Train in the Snow (The Locomotive)

Claude Monet (1875)

Claude Monet’s The Train in the Snow (The Locomotive) (1875) turns a suburban winter platform into a study of <strong>modernity absorbed by atmosphere</strong>. The engine’s twin yellow headlights and a smear of red push through a world of greys and violets as steam fuses with the low sky, while the right-hand fence and bare trees drill depth and cadence into the scene <sup>[1]</sup><sup>[4]</sup>. Monet fixes not an object but a <strong>moment of perception</strong>, where industry seems to dematerialize into weather <sup>[1]</sup><sup>[2]</sup>.